Generative AI can already do a lot when it comes to business-related tasks. Sales departments use it to write and edit emails for leads, HR speeds up resume review and job postings, marketing writes copies, and developers create code snippets and write tests. This technology is here to stay, and therefore, its use in business is quite expected.
But despite its fairly good results, generative AI is still not perfect. Depending on the industry in which it is used, these solutions can still produce vague, misguiding, or simply incorrect results. In order to minimize such risks, there are several frameworks you can use: fine-tuning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and embedding. In this article, we will analyze what they are, what the difference is between them, and which one is right for your case.
The first technology we are going to discuss is RAG. We will cover all the basics so you can have a clear understanding of what it does, how it works, and when it fails.
Let’s start with the definition of RAG. This term refers to an AI architecture that combines information retrieval with text generation to improve the accuracy of AI responses. For example, instead of asking a language model “What’s the latest financial report for this company?” and getting a guess, a RAG system would search your financial database for the real latest report, feed it into the AI, and generate a context-aware summary for you.
A RAG system has two components: a retriever that finds the necessary information in a large knowledge base, and a generator that writes the final answer.
Here’s how it works in simple terms:
Query: A user asks a question or requests something from the model, for example, “Summarize the latest cybersecurity breaches in healthcare.”
Retrieval: Depending on the query, the system searches a data source (like a document database, vector store, or the web) to find the most relevant pieces of information.
Augmentation: The retrieved text snippets are fed into the model’s context along with the user’s original prompt.
Generation: AI reads the augmented prompt and generates a response that’s directly informed by the retrieved documents, rather than relying solely on what it “knows” from training.
Post-processing (optional): Responses can be refined with citation injections, formatting, and validation.
That way, AI gives fresh, relevant, and more accurate answers because it looks things up instead of guessing.
This approach has plenty of benefits that will improve your AI implementation and provide more reliable insights:
More accurate answers: Instead of relying only on what it “remembers” from training, the AI looks up relevant documents in real time. That’s how you can minimize the risk of misinformation.
Easy access to specialized knowledge: You can connect the AI to your internal manuals of your choosing, databases, or reports, so it can answer questions that public AI models would never know.
Fewer hallucinations: Since the answers are based on the real sources, the AI is less likely to make up information.
Of course, just as everything in this world, this approach has its own risks and limitations. You need to take them into account if you decide to choose RAG for your model:
Result quality depends on the quality of sources: If the documents are outdated, unfinished, or inaccurate, the AI will have the same issues with its answers.
Search may miss key info: If the knowledge retrieval step doesn’t find the most relevant documents (due to poor indexing or unclear queries), the final answer might be off.
Setup and maintenance are required: You need to prepare and organize your knowledge base and always keep it up to date.
If you bear these limitations in mind, you will be able to face them prepared or even completely avoid them.
When it comes to optimizing AI models, RAG is the most effective way to make your solution work like clockwork. However, there are situations where RAG just suits better.
For customer support, RAG can optimize AI-based assistants so that they can pull relevant answers from FAQs, product manuals, or past tickets, and give customers consistent and accurate responses without any human intervention.
In research and knowledge work, RAG can summarize and compare information from multiple reports, articles, and studies. This approach is great for analysts, scientists, consultants, or journalists who need fact-based assistance.
Finally, if you work with educational materials and training courses, RAG will make sure the AI answers are based on course materials, textbooks, and lesson notes. Such an approach helps students get consistent explanations directly from the learning content.
The next optimization framework we are going to talk about is fine-tuning. This process can also help your model be better at answering specific questions and provide more accurate results.
Fine-tuning implies taking a pre-trained AI model and adjusting it with additional data so it performs better for a particular task/domain. Instead of training an AI model from scratch (which requires a lot of data, time, and money), fine-tuning starts with an existing model that already understands general language. Your task is then to “teach” it new patterns and terminology by giving it relevant and fresh examples.
In order to correctly go through the process of fine-tuning, you need to complete several crucial steps:
Start with a pre-trained model: Large language models (LLM) like GPT, Claude, or LLaMA are first trained on large datasets, so they have a general language understanding but may not know the details or style you need.
Prepare your own data: Collect examples that show what kind of content or behavior you want. Remember that the data must be clean and representative.
Train the model: Expose the model to your examples so it can learn from them in small adjustments. The goal is not to overwrite what it already knows, but to “nudge” it so it adopts your domain’s knowledge.
Validate the output: After fine-tuning, you test the model with prompts it hasn’t seen before and check if it writes what you want. If results are off, refine your data and repeat the process.
Deploy and monitor: Finally, when everything is done, integrate the model into your app, continue to monitor its performance, and update if necessary.
If you follow these steps, your model will be as accurate and well-performing as possible.
If you plan to integrate AI into your workflow or product features, fine-tuning is one of the most important processes you can apply to your model. It will bring you:
Domain-specific accuracy: The model becomes more aware of your business and niche by learning directly from your documents and examples.
Consistent style and tone: Fine-tuned models can create content with a specific voice or format in mind, which is useful for brand requirements.
Better performance: Tasks like legal drafting, medical summarization, or technical troubleshooting are finished faster and with less effort.
Fine-tuning is a powerful tool, but, unfortunately, not almighty. It has its own limits and drawbacks that can influence the way your model works. The risks include:
Need for high-quality data: Poor or biased examples will directly harm the model’s performance.
Cost and time to train: Collecting, cleaning, and processing data takes a lot of effort and often requires some technical expertise from the team.
Not a live knowledge update: When everything is fine-tuned, its knowledge is “frozen” until you retrain it, so no pulling information in real time.
Risk of overfitting: Fine-tuning data can be too narrow, and as a result, the model might respond well in those scenarios but do nothing outside them.
Fine-tuning is a versatile framework that suits a lot of use cases. This approach is universal and helps many industries create tailored AI solutions that complete various tasks in seconds with maximum accuracy. Still, there are some situations where avoiding this part will be detrimental.
For sectors like law or finance, where accuracy and terminology matter (a lot), fine-tuning chatbots, both internal and client-facing, is an absolute must. This also extends to customer service automation, where you must make sure responses match your company’s tone and support policies.
Finally, let’s talk about the final optimization approach—embeddings. This is also an essential part of working with AI. It’s a bridge between human language and machine understanding.
In short, embeddings are a way of representing information (words, sentences, or even images) as lists of numbers so that a computer can understand and compare their meaning. If we are talking about language, an embedding takes a piece of text and turns it into a vector, which is an ordered list of numbers. Texts with similar meanings will have embeddings that are close to each other in this “vector space.”
Here’s a step-by-step explanation of how embeddings work:
Turning text into numbers: Computers can’t understand words directly, so an embedding model converts words, phrases, or documents into vectors.
Creating the vector space: With the help of mathematical algorithms, the system builds a map where texts with similar meanings end up close together.
Comparing meanings: Once everything is in vector form, you can measure distance/similarity between them (a small distance is high similarity in meaning, a large distance is low similarity).
Using embeddings in AI systems: Embeddings can be used for semantic search, clustering, or recommendation systems.
This allows AI systems to organize information based on meaning rather than just word matches.
Embeddings allow your AI systems to do a lot of wonderful things:
Search by meaning, not just keywords: Find relevant content even when you use different words and prompts.
Language flexibility: Works across synonyms, paraphrases, and even multiple languages.
Scalability: Can handle large amounts of data efficiently.
However, embeddings have their own challenges that you need to be aware of:
Static knowledge: Embeddings represent the meaning at the time they were created. If the content changes, you need to re-generate them.
Storage and computation costs: Large datasets require a lot of storage for embeddings and computing power to compare them quickly.
Potential bias: If the embedding model was trained on biased data, those biases will be reflected in the results.
Embeddings can be useful in many cases, but there are situations when they are just the best. Here’s the list:
Semantic search: Letting users find relevant documents, FAQs, or articles.
Recommendation systems: Suggesting similar products, articles, or media.
Clustering and categorization: Grouping related items for data organization, tagging, or analysis.
Here’s a small comparison table to see how these three frameworks work:
Characteristic | RAG | Fine-tuning | Embeddings |
---|---|---|---|
Performance comparison | Strong at providing up-to-date, fact-based answers | Strong at specialized, consistent output in a defined domain | Not a full AI solution by itself, but highly effective at finding and grouping similar content |
Implementation complexity | Medium/high | High | Medium |
Data requirements | Requires a curated knowledge base | Requires high-quality, domain-specific training data | Requires enough content to represent meaning correctly |
Scalability | High | Medium | High |
Cost efficiency | Cost-effective approach | More expensive upfront for training and maintenance | Generally low ongoing costs |
Choosing between these three approaches depends on your goals, your knowledge base, and the available resources. Each approach addresses different needs and can even be combined for stronger results.
RAG is best when the information you work with changes all the time or comes from diverse sources. You can update the knowledge base without retraining, so it’s perfect for real-time content. Fine-tuning works best when the task is stable and highly specialized, and embeddings are important if your goal is to find relevant info quickly.
RAG requires a well-structured knowledge base and integration with an AI model. It can be complex to implement, but it’s less expensive to maintain than repeated fine-tuning. Fine-tuning demands resources upfront, which makes it more suitable for long-term, high-volume use cases. Embeddings are generally lighter to implement and scale, but they still need well-prepared data and a system for storage and similarity search.
Still, in many cases, the strongest solution is a combination of methods:
Fine-tuning can set the model’s tone, formats, and domain expertise. Also, fine-tuning embedding models for RAG to improve the retrieval layer.
RAG can then provide the model with up-to-date facts.
Embeddings enable the retrieval step by finding the most relevant pieces of information to feed into the model.
This approach is common in many industries where accuracy, compliance, and freshness of information are all critical.
Yellow is an experienced team of software development engineers who are ready to turn your idea into a functional and user-friendly solution. We have plenty of relevant expertise in machine learning and always pay close attention to details.
Why is Yellow your best development partner?
Product lab: We create our own software products, so we have first-hand experience in dealing with the whole product lifecycle and actively apply this knowledge to your solutions.
Transparency: No shady processes here. You are always in the loop of everything that’s going on with your product.
Quick response time: If you have any concerns or questions regarding your AI solution, we are here to answer all of them.
Security: We apply top-tier security protocols and always check your systems for vulnerabilities.
With us, your AI project will reach its ultimate goal in no time!
Now, you know the difference between RAG vs. fine-tuning vs. embedding approaches for your AI model. You can choose only one or combine them in the most efficient way that works for your project. These processes continue to change and upgrade, so AI optimization is becoming more and more efficient with each iteration. Whatever process you choose, you will get better results and more accurate responses.
Got a project in mind?
Fill in this form or send us an e-mail
Can RAG and fine-tuning be combined for better results?
Which method requires less computational power: RAG or fine-tuning?
Are embeddings suitable for real-time AI applications?
Get weekly updates on the newest design stories, case studies and tips right in your mailbox.